Thursday, March 28, 2013

blog 15 short analysis final


                   

Maritza Rodriguez

Teacher's Comments on a Student's paper. (Sample # 1)
     The writing process involves many revision strategies. Every writer has unique revisions and methods operative for his own goals. For instance, I like to do a series of alterations over days and weeks. Allowing my writing to sit for a couple of days and then returning to make changes, permits me to look at my text in a new way. This is when I am most able to express what I want to express in an intended manner. Most of the time, I have someone look over my writing before turning it in to the professor. This is a friend or a classmate with whom I feel comfortable asking to serve as detective of grammatical errors. Once I am satisfied with my final draft, I seek to find out how my writing is coming across to the reader. After all, we write so that the reader receives our message. For me, having someone read my writing at loud is my most important and best revision strategies. Once the final draft is completed, I meticulously check my writing focused on every aspect of audience expectations.  This process during the final draft, allows me to discover hitches and check for tone. However, the audience is present at certain degree during every drafting process from beginning to the end. A writer possesses purpose and audience awareness and the two are the driving forces in creating text and leading the revisions. 
     Language is more than spoken words.  Language creates and built views. The comment a teacher makes on his student's paper is a form of communication from the professor to the writer.  It serves as a teaching coaching technique. I seek to investigate what role language plays in the revision process by analyzing the teacher’s comments on a student’s paper. The student’s draft I am analyzing is sample I. As the edits the draft, audience expectations and purpose drive the revision process.  The way the student feels about the comment will also be a factor because as the writer of the paper, only he knows what he intended to say and not the professor who interprets it.
   After sorting my data, I found comments of compliments, suggestions and hesitation.   I have numbered the comments and I analyzed their meanings.  The data sets and their meanings are the route and choices of revision; that the student will most likely make to comply with the audience expectation.
  Compliments
1. I like the opening hook up to here.
2. This overview works well.
3. Derrick's textbook is a good place to start.
5. These points are clear.
6. Nice choice of example
8. The basic ideas of this paragraph are clear

  The first sets of data are the compliments.  The compliments are well done work in the writing.  It lets the student know the specifics part of the draft that were done well. In general, the student will leave those particular areas as it is since the teacher finds it satisfying. He would most likely not change the sentences where compliments were received for there are no reasons to make changes.  However, since compliments are shining areas of his writing, he might decide to make them stand out or and repeat similar actions.  For example, the compliment, “nice choice of example”, would perhaps prompt the student to give more examples in that same manner throughout his paper. 
 Data under suggestions
The comments of suggestions and relevant meaning are listed below an in general they are the recommended guidelines the instructor provided and they prompt the student to revise. By making corrections as suggested, the end result will be a well improved paper.  The italics are the teacher's comments preceding my interpretation of what the statements mean in the student's revision process.
 3. One of the theorists Herrick discusses would be a stronger choice.
This is a recommendation to change theorist.  The student will select a stronger choice of theorist based on this recommendation.
5. I wonder though, if this might be a place to play off students' definitions of argument. 
This will prompt the writer to change the location of the definitions on the writing.
5. How do these views contradict or enrich their expectations of what an argument should be?
The professor wants the student to include one of the two: contradiction or the enrichment provided.
7. Can you say more about how they fit together? 
The student will elaborate and give details about how they fit together or connect
8. But, I feel they could be taken further.
The student will dig deeper and explain the topic further.  This gives more information to the reader and expands the writing.
8. Why should students care about opposing viewpoints?
The student will give a general believe or about 
8. How should they deal with them if they must be incorporated into the argument? Give reason why
8. But it doesn't really tell students how to deal with sources that challenge their viewpoint and that they can't ignore. 
This makes the writer rethink he\is position on that idea.
9. Why is it important in this situation? 
This comment engages the students in critical thinking skills and will prompt to rethink and elaborate conversation.  This expands his ideas or concepts.
Data under inexact
1. This bit feels tacked on to me.
3. But I don't feel he's the strongest person
4. I'm not sure
7. The logical connection between these sentences isn't clear to me.
7. The bullets in this section are good advice for research in general, but it doesn't really tell students how to deal with sources that challenge their viewpoint and that they can't ignore.
9. Some theorists would disagree with stating the thesis first.

    Inexact comments are unclear writing and inclusion the professor does not see why it was included.  They are inclusions the student should revise to improve the writing, so that it is congruent with the context. In these areas something was done well, and something was not done right.  Therefore, there is certain part of it that the student will most appropriately revise.  For example, on comment number 3, the writer choice of Herrick as the theorist leaves the instructor wondering why that choice and not the best one which he proceeded to commend. 
     The overall teacher's comment might be the first place the student would stare because he would want to know how well he did in general.  Afterward, he might look at the individual exact comments found throughout the paper to start working on them right away if possible. The choice will depend on factors in the student’s thinking. The overall comments inform the student how well he is meeting the assignment’s requirement.  For example, the professor states specifics weakness or areas of improvement and relates in what ways objectives were met. In other words, the general comments are important; because they are general statements that let the student know where he should revise. These comments are not to be taken lightly. Students know not to under estimate suggestions on the overall comments.  Not making corrections will earn a lower grade.  A student's good work represents effective learning. Teachers want to see what students have learned since the main goal of a professor is to teach.  The professor accesses how much and how well learning occurred through the student work. The student recognizes that professors measure learning and that this assignment tests his learning. Therefore, the student edits and improves his work which the teacher then sees as learning progress. This results in the student receiving a good grade.
Conclusion
     In conclusion, there are many revision strategies derived from a teacher comments.  In this short language analysis, I have given evidence of just how language transcend beyond simple talks. The teacher’s comments in their literary context are building tools and are capable of creating a mastery work. The student would revise with the teacher in mind since the professor is his audience. He would engage in rhetorical analysis in order to meet this specific goal.  In doing so, he would ask himself pertaining rhetorical questions in order to meet every possible expectation. The teacher provides the assignment and so the student will write and revise to meet the assignment guidelines. The student makes improvement to get to the level where the teacher can see his progress. The student might say, “I am doing this assignment because it is a school requirement designed to improve my learning”. Most likely, however, the student will make changes to his paper to get a good grade. If the teacher does not see the learning in the student’s work, well then the student will not get a good grade.        
                   

No comments:

Post a Comment